Deposition of Nancy Salzman, 2000


0001

0001

 1   UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 

 2   NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK                       

 3   -------------------------------------------

 4   IN RE:    TONI F. NATALIE,              Chapter 7

                          Debtor,            Case No. 99-16195

 5   -------------------------------------------

 6   NANCY SALZMAN,

 7                        Plaintiff,

 8             -against-                     Adv. Proc. No. 00-90169

 9   TONI F. NATALIE and NATIONAL HEALTH OUTLET-A 

10   PLACE OF CREATIONS, INC.,

11                        Defendants.                  

12   ---------------------------------------------------------

13                  STENOGRAPHIC MINUTES OF Deposition

14             conducted of Plaintiff, NANCY SALZMAN, on the

15             15th day of November, 2000, at the offices of

16             Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, One Commerce Plaza,

17             Albany, New York commencing at 10:59 a.m.;

18             before ELLEN J. FRANKOVITCH, a Shorthand

19             Reporter and Notary Public within and for the

20             State of New York.

21  

22  

23  

24  

0002

 1   APPEARANCES:

 2   WHITEMAN, OSTERMAN & HANNA

     One Commerce Plaza

 3   Albany, New York 12260

     On behalf of Plaintiff;

 4   BY:  MARGARET CANGILOS-RUIZ, ESQ.

 5   

 6   MICHAEL B. RUDIN, ESQ.

     Suite 142, The Powers Building

 7   16 West Main Street

     Rochester, New York 14614-1601

 8   On behalf of Defendant.

 9   

10   JAMES P. TRAINOR, ESQ.

     636 Plank Road, Suite 108

11   Clifton Park, New York 12065

     On behalf of Keith Raniere.

12   

13   

14   

15   ALSO PRESENT:  TONI NATALIE

16                  JOAN SCHNEIER

17  

18  

19  

20  

21  

22  

23  

24  

0003

 1                    S T I P U L A T I O N S

 2   

 3                  It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and

 4             between the attorneys for the respective

 5             parties hereto that the signing and filing of

 6             the Notary's Oath be waived; that the

 7             examination be conducted before Ellen J.

 8             Frankovitch, a Shorthand Reporter and Notary

 9             Public in and for the State of New York; that

10             the filing of the transcript of testimony in

11             the Office of the Clerk of the Court be waived;

12             that the examining party will furnish the

13             examined party one copy of the transcript of

14             testimony as taken without cost or charge; that

15             all objections to questions, except as to the

16             form thereof, are specifically reserved to the

17             time of trial; and that the transcript of

18             testimony may be signed before any Notary

19             Public or other officer authorized to

20             administer oaths.

21   

22  

23  

24  

0004

 1                        NANCY SALZMAN,

 2                  (having been first duly sworn by the

 3             Notary Public, was examined and testified as

 4             follows:)

 5   BY MR. RUDIN:

 6   Q.   Ms. Salzman, can you tell us where you reside.

 7   A.   7 Grant Hill Road, Clifton Park, New York.

 8   Q.   Do you reside there with anyone other than yourself? 

 9   A.   My daughter.

10   Q.   What is your daughter's name?

11   A.   Lauren.

12   Q.   How old is she?

13   A.   24.

14   Q.   Can you tell us your age?

15   A.   I'm 46.

16   Q.   And can you tell us what your educational background

17        is.

18   A.   I'm a nurse.  I have a college degree in nursing.

19   Q.   What kind of degree?

20   A.   I have a bachelor's degree in nursing. 

21   Q.   Bachelor of science or bachelor of arts?

22   A.   Bachelor's of science in nursing.

23   Q.   Any other degrees beyond that?

24   A.   No.

0005

 1   Q.   Any other professional training beyond that?

 2   A.   Well, I have a lot of professional training beyond

 3        that.

 4   Q.   Can you tell us what your professional training

 5        beyond nursing is?

 6   A.   I have several years of Ericksonian training.

 7   Q.   Can you tell us what that is?

 8   A.   It's a post-graduate type of training that taught me

 9        how to use and apply brief solution-based models of

10        therapy and hypnosis.  And also I took a course at

11        Columbia University in hypnosis, but that was given

12        with Dr. Herbert Siegel. 

13   Q.   Is the training you received in this Ericksonian

14        method, was it through a college or private

15        institution or was it individual?

16   A.   There were several types of trainings I took.  I

17        took a series of courses through the National

18        Institutes of Health.  I took -- that was given in

19        Bethesda, Maryland.  I took a series of courses at

20        Reuters University.  And then I took a series of

21        courses that were given privately by different

22        practitioners of the Ericksonian therapeutic method.

23   Q.   Can you tell us what the Ericksonian method is, or

24        at least generalize?

0006

 1   A.   Milton Erickson is considered to be one of the

 2        foremost experts in clinical hypnoses in the world,

 3        and there's an Ericksonian Foundation that offers

 4        courses all over the world.  And he is considered to

 5        be the founder of brief solution-based models of

 6        therapy.  So I've taken many of those courses since

 7        1979.

 8   Q.   Can you tell us what brief solutions means?

 9   A.   Originally when I started studying this, it was a

10        new approach to therapy back in the '70s.  Now, it's

11        the standard accepted type of therapy.

12   Q.   When you say therapy, what kind of therapy?

13   A.   Psychotherapy.

14   Q.   Is it geared to any specific or special type of

15        ailments?

16   A.   It's a general approach to working with people who

17        have psychological issues, problems.

18   Q.   Does it entail prescribing any medication?

19   A.   No.

20   Q.   Now, you said you took a course at Columbia that was

21        sort of a similar type thing but on hypnosis? 

22   A.   That was more traditional hypnosis.

23   Q.   What other professional training or professional

24        endeavors have you taken part in?

0007

 1   A.   I took several courses in neurolinguistic

 2        programming.

 3   Q.   What is that?

 4   A.   It's a model of behavioral change.  It's a blend of

 5        behavioral and cognitive psychology and formal

 6        linguistics.

 7   Q.   Where did you take those courses?

 8   A.   All over the country.

 9   Q.   Through recognized universities or recognized

10        educational programs?

11   A.   NLP is taught through different institutions all

12        over the country.

13   Q.   What types of institutions?

14   A.   There's an institution in New Town, Pennsylvania

15        called the Eastern NLP Institute.  I took training

16        from Connie Ray and Steve Andrus.  They have the

17        largest institute in the country and I can't

18        remember the name right now.  It's in Colorado.  I

19        took courses from Robert Dilts, one of the founders,

20        and Richard Banbler, who's also one of the founders. 

21        And courses from John Grinder, who was also one of

22        the founders, and Tad James.  And Wyatt Wood Small.

23   Q.   In your professional -- as a professional, how would

24        you use neurolinguistics?  What does it do, what is

0008

 1        its purpose?

 2   A.   It's a model for human behavior change.

 3   Q.   Well, that's very general.  What did you do with it;

 4        beat people up to make them change, put them in dark

 5        rooms?  You must do something to make people change. 

 6        Tell us what you do or what NLP does.

 7   A.   It's a type of -- it's a cognitive approach where

 8        you can talk to the person.  It has a model of

 9        change; it has several different techniques to work

10        with.

11   Q.   You talk to people.  I'm just trying to figure

12        out -- I mean, most psychologists, psychiatrists,

13        they talk to people, but obviously this is something

14        different than traditional psychiatry or

15        psychoanalysis?

16   A.   They use different models as well.  They might use a

17        Freudian model or Gestalt model.  This is an NLP

18        model.  

19   Q.   Is it recognized by practicing psychiatrists in this

20        country?

21   A.   When you say recognized?

22   Q.   Well, if you look in a book that's published either

23        by or for psychologists that are physicians, would

24        they recognize this as a model that would be useful

0009

 1        for them?

 2   A.   There are psychiatrists who use this model.

 3   Q.   I take it, obviously, the rest --

 4   A.   And psychologists and social workers who do use this

 5        model.  There are many different models used in the

 6        field.

 7   Q.   Can you tell me, what does that model mean?  I know

 8        what Freudian does or what it is.  What does NLP do

 9        that's different than Freudian? 

10   A.   The goals are the same.

11   Q.   To cure the person or to change?

12   A.   To help the person make behavioral changes.

13   Q.   The methods are different, I take it?

14   A.   Yes.

15   Q.   What methods does NLP use to try to get people to

16        change?  In general, then I'll go specific.  But in

17        general?

18   A.   I don't understand what you mean by methods.

19   Q.   Do you use hypnosis?  Do you use sound deprivation,

20        light deprivation, sleep deprivation?

21   A.   There are a series of techniques in NLP, and NLP

22        uses things that are called reframing,

23        submodalities, belief change procedures, parts

24        integrations.  These are the names of techniques.

0010

 1   Q.   How do you perform those techniques?

 2   A.   By talking to the person.

 3   Q.   It's just talking?

 4   A.   It's a talking type of a therapy that acts as a

 5        conscious and unconscious process.

 6   Q.   Does it also use hypnosis? 

 7   A.   It accesses different states.  Not deep trance, if

 8        that's what you're referring to.

 9   Q.   You're not putting somebody in a trance; you're

10        basically speaking to people, trying to communicate?

11   A.   For the most part, that's correct.

12   Q.   The hypnosis part of your training would be separate

13        from NLP?

14   A.   Correct.

15   Q.   What period of time did you take these NLP courses? 

16   A.   I started in 1985 taking neurolinguistic programming

17        courses, and I took them up to probably '92.

18   Q.   Where were you working at that time?

19   A.   I had my own practice here, and for a period of the

20        time I worked for different people that I was also

21        studying with.

22   Q.   Doing the same kind of thing?

23   A.   Teaching, and I learned to train and I taught NLP.

24   Q.   Before your learning training NLP and NLP, what was

0011

 1        your employment before that?

 2   A.   Before learning NLP?

 3   Q.   Yes.

 4   A.   I worked with my husband at that time, who was a

 5        physician, and I saw clients and did some

 6        counselling.

 7   Q.   What kind of physician was he?

 8   A.   He was an internist.

 9   Q.   They're not necessarily related to what he did and

10        what you did?

11   A.   We did it in the same office and shared patients.

12   Q.   He's an internist and you're giving psychological

13        counselling, whatever; correct?

14   A.   I did counselling. 

15   Q.   With his patients? 

16   A.   With his and some other physicians as well. 

17   Q.   And before that?

18   A.   That's it.  I worked in a hospital for a year.

19   Q.   What was your nursing specialty, if any?

20   A.   Well, my -- I didn't have a nursing specialty, per

21        se.

22   Q.   You weren't like a surgical nurse, for instance?

23   A.   No.

24   Q.   Just a general nursing degree?

0012

 1   A.   Yes.  

 2   Q.   You say you had an office with your husband.  Were

 3        you a licensed psychologist at the time?

 4   A.   No.

 5   Q.   Do you need to get a license to be a psychologist?

 6   A.   No -- you need a license to be a psychologist, yes. 

 7        But I wasn't a psychologist.

 8   Q.   You weren't a psychologist back then?

 9   A.   No.

10   Q.   Have you ever applied for a psychology license?

11   A.   No.

12   Q.   What do you classify as what you do?

13   A.   Now?  

14   Q.   Yes.

15   A.   I do coaching and I do a business where I teach

16        people strategies for success, and I do coaching.

17   Q.   And that's got nothing to do with psychology, at

18        least not directly?

19   A.   No.

20   Q.   During this NLP period of time, did you have a

21        license as a psychologist?

22   A.   I did not.

23   Q.   Did you give people psychological counselling?

24   A.   I did psychotherapy.

0013

 1   Q.   And you're saying that's not psychological

 2        counselling?

 3   A.   It's referred to as psychotherapy.

 4   Q.   Was what you were doing recognized by the State of

 5        New York?

 6   A.   I was not licensed as a psychologist or social

 7        worker in the State of New York.

 8   Q.   Did you utilize any of the facilities of the State

 9        of New York; for instance, any medical care,

10        Medicaid or federal stuff, Medicare?

11   A.   I did not personally.

12   Q.   Did you ever bill Medicare for any of your services?

13   A.   No.

14   Q.   Your patients were always private pay patients?

15   A.   My patients were always private pay.

16   Q.   Did you ever at any time ever collect monies from

17        any state agency or health care provider?

18   A.   Personally?  No.

19   Q.   Did any of your businesses?

20   A.   I had licensed therapists who worked for me.

21   Q.   You weren't licensed but they were licensed?

22   A.   Correct.  

23   Q.   Can you tell me who Maggie Willis is? 

24   A.   Maggie Willis is a therapist who worked for me.

0014

 1   Q.   Where did she work for you, what place?

 2   A.   I had two offices.  I had an office at Stuyvesant

 3        Plaza and I had an office at New Karner Road in

 4        Albany.

 5   Q.   For what period of time did she work for you?

 6   A.   She started working for me -- you know...

 7   Q.   If you recall?

 8   A.   I think she worked for me five years.

 9   Q.   During all that period of time, was she a licensed

10        therapist?

11   A.   No.

12   Q.   At some point you're saying she had become a

13        licensed therapist?

14   A.   Yes.

15   Q.   Can you tell me what a licensed therapist is or was?

16   A.   Maggie was a social worker and Maggie had a social

17        work degree.  There are six years of supervised

18        practice that a social worker must have in order to

19        become licensed.

20   Q.   Was she doing her supervision through you or through

21        your company?

22   A.   Through my company, yes.

23   Q.   Who was her supervisor?

24   A.   Frank Macri.

0015

 1   Q.   And he was, in fact, a licensed therapist?

 2   A.   That's correct.

 3   Q.   During this time while you were running this office

 4        and these people were doing therapy, what were you

 5        doing?

 6   A.   A variety of different things.  I was doing

 7        organizational management and development.  I was

 8        teaching trainings for different organizations and

 9        industry in health care.

10   Q.   Through this company?

11   A.   Yes.

12   Q.   So the company was sort of an umbrella company doing

13        different things?

14   A.   Yes.

15   Q.   What was the name of the company?

16   A.   The International Center for Change.

17   Q.   Was it d/b/a or corporation?

18   A.   Corporation.

19   Q.   Who were the principals of the corporation?

20   A.   Originally, it was myself and James Pike.  And he

21        left the company in 1997 and then it was just me.

22   Q.   And you carried on the company?

23   A.   That's correct.

24   Q.   Was it a New York corporation?

0016

 1   A.   Yes.

 2   Q.   And when you say -- this is my words, so if I'm

 3        wrong, correct me -- you did training for

 4        corporations?

 5   A.   That's correct.

 6   Q.   What kind of training?  

 7   A.   In communications, and some organizational

 8        development and management using neurolinguistic

 9        programming as a model.

10   Q.   The word programming strikes me.  What do you mean

11        by neurolinguistic programming?  I understand the

12        model thing, but does programming mean more than

13        that?

14   A.   It's the name of the model NLP, neurolinguistic

15        programming.

16   Q.   Did you give presentations and those kinds of

17        things?

18   A.   Yes.

19   Q.   Are these for various corporations?

20   A.   Yes.

21   Q.   Are you still doing that type of work?

22   A.   Not as much as I was in the past, very little of

23        that type of work.

24   Q.   What type of work are you doing now?

0017

 1   A.   I have another company now.

 2   Q.   What is the name of that company? 

 3   A.   Executive Success Programs, Incorporated.

 4   Q.   A New York corporation?

 5   A.   Delaware.

 6   Q.   Licensed to do business in New York State? 

 7   A.   I imagine.  I'm in New York State.

 8   Q.   You're located in New York State?

 9   A.   That's correct.

10   Q.   Who incorporated that business?

11   A.   I did.

12   Q.   Who physically did the paperwork for that business?

13   A.   Toni Natalie helped me do the paperwork.

14   Q.   You incorporated the paperwork --

15   A.   She helped me incorporate that.

16   Q.   Did you do it through the Internet?

17   A.   Yes.

18   Q.   And you got at some point a corporate certificate

19        from Delaware?

20   A.   Yes.

21   Q.   After you had the corporate, did you do bylaws of

22        the corporation, minutes to the meetings, those

23        kinds of things?

24   A.   Yes.

0018

 1   Q.   And you keep those on a regular basis?

 2   A.   Yes.

 3   Q.   And you think the corporation is licensed in New

 4        York State.

 5   A.   (No response.)

 6   Q.   I'm just asking you.

 7   A.   I filed the papers and I do business in New York

 8        State.

 9   Q.   And you pay taxes in New York State?

10   A.   That's correct.

11   Q.   Who are the principals of that corporation?

12   A.   I am.

13   Q.   And who are the directors?

14   A.   I'm the director.

15   Q.   You're the sole director?

16   A.   Yes. 

17   Q.   Who are the officers of the corporation? 

18   A.   I am.

19   Q.   And that corporation is operating at the present

20        time?

21   A.   It is.

22   Q.   Can I ask you who First Principles, Inc. is, if you

23        know?

24   A.   It's another company that I own.

0019

 1   Q.   You own that?

 2   A.   Yes. 

 3   Q.   Do you know of a guy named Glazer out of New York

 4        City?  I don't know his first name, but his last

 5        name is Glazer.

 6   A.   I don't think so. 

 7   Q.   Is that business licensed to do business in New York

 8        State?

 9   A.   First Principles?  I also incorporated that business

10        in Delaware.

11   Q.   Not New York State?

12   A.   That's correct.

13   Q.   What does that corporation do?

14   A.   That corporation holds the patents for my other

15        company.

16   Q.   What patents are those?

17   A.   I have a couple of patents that are pending for

18        rational inquiry.

19   Q.   Copyrights or patents?

20   A.   They're patent pending.

21   Q.   The reason I ask, patents generally have to do with

22        mechanical devices. 

23   A.   These are intellectual property patents.

24   Q.   Who invented these particular items that you're

0020

 1        trying to get a patent on?

 2   A.   Keith Raniere.

 3   Q.   And they're in your corporation name?

 4   A.   Yes.

 5   Q.   And you applied for them?

 6   A.   Yes.

 7   Q.   Does it list him and First Principle as having any

 8        interest in those patents?

 9   A.   I'm -- I don't know how to answer the question. 

10        They're his -- they have his name because he's the

11        originator.  They're owned by my company.

12   Q.   Did you purchase those from him?

13   A.   The patents?

14   Q.   Yes.

15   A.   No.

16   Q.   Have you made an agreement to pay him a remuneration

17        from whatever you received from those patents from

18        any of the money that you earn for use of those

19        patents?

20                  (Ms. Cangilos-Ruiz and the witness

21             confer.)

22                  MR. RUDIN:  The same rules are going to

23             apply.

24                  MS. CANGILOS-RUIZ:  If you don't

0021

 1             understand, don't answer.

 2   A.   I don't understand.

 3   Q.   Somebody's got patents.  Do you think they've got

 4        any value?

 5   A.   Yes.

 6   Q.   Did Keith just give you those patents and say you

 7        can do what you want with them?

 8   A.   Provided that I use them in the way that he wants

 9        them used, he gave me those patents.

10   Q.   And he doesn't expect to receive any money or

11        remuneration of any kind?

12   A.   At some point we have an agreement that he will get

13        a portion of my profits.

14   Q.   So there is an agreement that he will be paid for

15        the use of those patents at some point?

16   A.   That's correct.

17   Q.   Is there an agreement for an amount or percentage?

18   A.   It's a percentage.

19   Q.   Of whatever you gross, I assume?

20   A.   Yes.

21   Q.   Could I ask, why are they being registered in your

22        name and not his name?

23   A.   That was the agreement that he made with me.

24   Q.   I'm asking you why.

0022

 1                  MS. CANGILOS-RUIZ:  I am going to object

 2             only because this question goes well beyond the

 3             litigation that's framed right now in the

 4             bankruptcy court.

 5                  MR. RUDIN:  No, it doesn't because the

 6             thing is that your claim is Keith Raniere owned

 7             my client's business 80 percent, but not on the

 8             record.  I want to know -- which is the same

 9             kind of situation here -- why he owns these

10             things not on the record.

11                  MS. CANGILOS-RUIZ:  I think because of the

12             judge's recent ruling, the 523 action has been

13             dismissed and we are now limited to the 727

14             counts.

15                  MR. RUDIN:  Correct.

16                  MS. CANGILOS-RUIZ:  And I will give you

17             some leeway, but I am going to have to reassert

18             my objection if you pursue this line of

19             question because I do not see it as relevant to

20             the causes of action as currently framed.

21                  MR. TRAINOR:  I join in the objection.

22   BY MR. RUDIN:

23   Q.   What's your relationship with Keith Raniere?

24   A.   He's my mentor.

0023

 1   Q.   Can you tell me what that means?

 2   A.   I met Keith in 1997 and we made an agreement that he

 3        would teach me his model and mentor me.

 4   Q.   What's his model?

 5   A.   It's called rational inquiry.

 6   Q.   Is that a psychotherapy type of model?

 7   A.   It's a philosophical type of model that has

 8        philosophical and educational and scientific

 9        applications.

10   Q.   For what?

11   A.   A variety of different things.

12   Q.   I mean, is it for people, is it for?

13   A.   It's for -- the way that I use it is with people.

14   Q.   Can you tell me what Keith Raniere's address is?

15   A.   I don't know.

16   Q.   How long have you known Tony Natalie?

17   A.   Since 1997, November. 

18   Q.   How did you meet her?

19   A.   I came into her outlet and my ex-husband's wife,

20        Sandy Padilla introduced me to her.

21   Q.   That was not a business relationship at that point,

22        I take it, just personal?  When you got introduced

23        to her it was not for business purposes?

24   A.   It was for business.

0024

 1   Q.   What were the business purposes that you got

 2        introduced to Toni Natalie for?

 3   A.   Sandy brought me to Toni's place of business to meet

 4        her and Toni introduced me to her company that day.

 5   Q.   Where was that place of business?

 6   A.   In Clifton Park on Route 9.

 7   Q.   Do you remember the name of the business?

 8   A.   National Health Outlet.